Friday, December 30, 2011

Thoughts: Hazards of dependence on surrogate endpoints


Thoughts: Hazards of dependence on surrogate endpoints


HK: Professor Yudkin et al. (The idolatry of the surrogate (2011)) offer a very important insight into the use of surrogate endpoints in medical science.   They argue that this practice - so widespread, especially in diabetes care - is tantamount to losing sight of the patient's interest.   It's a very readable piece -- a challenge to much of our work in public health & chronic-disease epidemiology.   It adds to the growing chorus of criticisms directed at the "guidelines" we (used to) cherish.

YC:  I like to read this kind of article.We are fool only when we think surrogate is a real/only cause of the disease. I agree that the hard event is the most important for evaluation of a treatment. However, the authors seem ignoring the whole spectrum of development of science, which is from short range (quick surrogate) to long range (hard event). If a drug even cannot control the level of meaningful surrogate such as glucose and blood pressure, I don’t think that the drug is good for controlling of the hard event beyond the surrogate.


BTW, the example of rosiglitazone exactly demonstrates that the scientists or physicians (maybe I need say good scientists ^_^) didn’t forget the target beyond the glucose and stop digging up more evidences. Anyhow, this is a heads-up for someone.


Selected References of The idolatry of the surrogate (2011):

No comments: