Disclaimer: This blog site is intended solely for sharing of information. Comments are warmly welcome, but I make no warranties regarding the quality, content, completeness, suitability, adequacy, sequence, or accuracy of the information.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Word and Phrase search in PDF Files
http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/word-and-phrase-search-pdf-files
.htm
Wednesday, April 07, 2010
Don't Be Loopy: Re-Sampling and Simulation the SASR Way
Way
Monday, April 05, 2010
A French view on obesity as a social construction, with mention of CDC.
A French view on obesity as a social construction, with mention of CDC.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
If you've read many http://howstuffworks.com/ articles, you've seen a lot of terminology thrown around -- words such as mass, force, torque, work, power and energy. What do the-se words really mean, and are they interchangeable? Go to http://howstuffworks.com/ and find the answer.
_From Bob
It is well recognized in the methodological literature that dichotomization of continuous variables introduces major problems in the analysis and interpretation of models derived in a data-dependent fashion. Nevertheless, dichotomization of continuous variables is widespread in clinical research. Problems include loss of information, reduction in power, uncertainty in defining the cutpoint, arriving at a biologically implausible step function as the estimate of a dose–response function, and the impossibility of detecting a non-monotonic dose–response relation. Uncertainty in how to select a ‘sensible’ cutpoint to group a continuous variable into two classes has led researchers to use either the median or an ‘optimal’ cutpoint. The latter approach gives a highly inflated type 1 error probability, together with biased parameter estimates and variances that are too small [9, 11]. Although some remedies for these diffculties have been developed [9, 21–23], none of the authors of these papers actually recommends the use of ‘optimal’ cutpoints with their proposed corrections. In general, the situation seems hardly to have improved since the advice in 1993 of Maxwell and Delaney [1] to avoid dichotomization, quoted at the beginning of this paper.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Friday, March 05, 2010
In memory of Dr. John Denis McGarry
Dr. Denis McGarry was a great teacher and sage. His lecture affects my way of thinking on diabetes. Unforgettable.
Thursday, March 04, 2010
K M Venkat Narayan: A case of well-intentioned public health reductionism?
reductionism?
Very good comments.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Monday, February 22, 2010
FDA internal reports unhappy about rosiglitazone (Avandia)
Research Ties Diabetes Drug to Heart Woes
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/health/policy/20avandia.html
Does anyone know why Avandia increases the risk of CHD? Is because of efficiently lowing the glucose level (too low)? Or any other side-effects.
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
A Lasting Gift to Medicine That Wasn't Really a Gift
A Lasting Gift to Medicine That Wasn’t Really a Gift
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/health/02seco.html?th&emc=th
A cell line called HeLa (for Henrietta Lacks) was born. Those immortal cells soon became the workhorse of laboratories everywhere. HeLa cells were used to develop the first polio vaccine, they were launched into space for experiments in zero gravity and they helped produce drugs for numerous diseases, including Parkinson’s, leukemia and the flu. By now, literally tons of them have been produced.
Dr. Gey did not make money from the cells, but they were commercialized. Now they are bought and sold every day the world over, and they have generated millions in profits.
Ukrainian registry of type 2 dm shows U-shaped relation of BMI to mortality
(Heart 2009;95:454-460. doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.150524)
Not too surprising, a common sense is that extreme, fundamental, or radical ends are not good. But one of the interesting figures (finding) is even obese population (≥45) had lower risk of death than low BMI population (<20 for all-cause death, and <21 for CVD death).
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Thursday, January 14, 2010
_____________________________________________
Obesity rate appears to be stabilizing.
ABC World News (1/13, story 8, 0:20, Stephanopoulos) reported, "New numbers today from the CDC show the rate of obesity stabilizing."
The New York Times (1/14, A20, Belluck) reports that "Americans, at least as a group, may have reached their peak of obesity." The good news is that "the numbers indicate that obesity rates have remained constant for at least five years among men and for closer to 10 years among women and children -- long enough for experts to say the percentage of very overweight people has leveled off." The bad news is that "nearly 34 percent of adults are obese, more than double the percentage 30 years ago," while "the share of obese children tripled during that time, to 17 percent," according to studies published online Jan. 13 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The first study "examined height and weight data in a nationally representative sample of 5,555 adult Americans collected in 2007 and 2008," the Los Angeles Times (1/14, Stein) reports. "In the sample, 33.8% of the subjects" were "obese." After comparing "those numbers...to ones collected from 1999 to 2006 in a similar sample," researchers found that "among women, obesity statistics remained fairly flat throughout the period encompassed by the two studies," while "obesity rates among men rose slightly during the decade, but leveled off in the later years."
In the second study of nearly 4,000 children ranging in age from two to 19, the Wall Street Journal (1/14, Dooren) reports, researchers found that 17% of the youngsters met the threshold for obesity and 32% could be deemed to be overweight, a pattern similar to what was seen a decade ago. For both studies, the Journal notes that the CDC researchers based their estimates on data derived from the most recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.
USA Today (1/14, Hellmich) reports that "William Dietz, director of the CDC's Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, says this may reflect that people are becoming aware of 'the adverse health consequences of obesity' and are adopting healthier habits." Still, when it comes to the impact of obesity on children, Cynthia L. Ogden, PhD, the author of both studies, is concerned, because "obese kids are at a greater risk of weight-related health problems such as high cholesterol, blood pressure, and diabetes, plus they are at a greater risk of becoming obese adults, she says."
Bloomberg News (1/14, Ostrow), the AP (1/14, Tanner), Reuters (1/14, Steenhuysen), Time (1/13, Kluger), HealthDay (1/13, Gordon), &&&WebMD (1/13, DeNoon), and &&&HeartWire (1/13, O'Riordan) also covered the story.
Friday, January 08, 2010
A nice article for understanding the relation of disease and DNA and epigenetic markers
... Biologists offer this analogy as an explanation: if the genome is the hardware, then the epigenome is the software. "I can load Windows, if I want, on my Mac," says Joseph Ecker, a Salk Institute biologist and leading epigenetic scientist. "You're going to have the same chip in there, the same genome, but different software. And the outcome is a different cell type."...
Thursday, December 10, 2009
High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is also known as corn syrup, isoglucose and fructose on package labels and has been undergoing scrutiny for the last several years. Back in the '80s, when the low-fat craze started, HFCS began to be added to everything as a relatively easy way to add flavor and moisture to lower-fat products. Seemed like a great idea at the time. Corn is in abundance in the United States, and corn syrup is cheap and easy to add to commercially prepared foods. Little did we know that this type of sugar is digested very differently, and unlike glucose, actually prevents you from feeling full even when you have eaten a lot. Here's how it works: You eat something with HFCS and the sugar goes to your liver for processing. There it gets broken down into smaller components and eventually gets broken down completely. This is how all sugars are managed by the body. The problem is HFCS uses a lot more of the cell's energy to breakdown and leaves the cell with less energy to properly metabolize other foods. In addition, the breakdown products of the process cause an increase in lipid levels and triglycerides in the blood and within the cell itself, causing the fat to fill the cell. HFCS metabolism increases circulating insulin levels significantly and results in insulin resistance (the precursor of adult onset diabetes and metabolic syndrome). Lastly, unlike glucose, HFCS byproducts in the blood send a message to the brain that you are still hungry and need to eat. The more you eat, the more you crave! Most other sugars get stored in the cell, not as fat but as a substance called glycogen that can be easily mobilized for energy when needed, unlike the lipid that is formed from HFCS that is hard to mobilize when needed. HFCS leads to fatty liver, high blood lipids and triglycerides, high blood insulin levels and a continued craving to eat even when the body doesn't need any more calories. This is a recipe for central body obesity, heart disease, diabetes and liver failure from fatty deposits. Interestingly, this is the exact outcome when alcohol is consumed (minus the buzz or drunken feeling). If you drink alcohol too much, you get a "beer belly" (central obesity), fatty liver, heart disease from high triglycerides and lipids, and type 2 diabetes. We wouldn't dream of giving our kids alcohol, but as it turns out, HFCS is metabolized in the exact same way with the same damage done, calorie for calorie. For most adults, some alcohol drinking is OK, but excessive use or abuse can lead to serious long-term physical consequences. The same is true for HFCS. By the way, even though fresh fruit contains fructose, because it is "packaged" with natural fiber, it is digested very differently and doesn't cause these changes. Whole, fresh fruit is healthy, but fruit juices, fruit roll-ups and fruit snacks are devoid of the fiber and therefore no better than candy. I encourage families to spend time reading labels and becoming aware of how ubiquitous this additive is. It is in store-bought bread, crackers, pop, cookies, some lunch meats, fruit juices, packaged chocolate milk, candy, all-natural fruit snacks and many other packaged foods. I am not suggesting you need to completely eliminate it from your life, but I encourage you to decrease the amount your family eats every day.
Dr. Molly O'Shea is a Troy pediatrician. Read Dr. Molly's blog, get answers to your questions and discuss children's health issues at detnews.com/drmolly.
Friday, November 13, 2009
http://www.healthnewsreview.org/
Monday, November 09, 2009
http://www.library.nhs.uk/Diabetes/ViewResource.aspx?resID=328114
This is the third year of review on diabetes issues.